G-Structure
G-Structure/Research
Preliminary edition · August 2026

Execution Friction Index

How much distance there is, in real professional settings, between deciding to do something and doing it. An open measure, built on KAIRON's anonymized sessions.

A note on this edition

This first edition is published with a pilot sample of 52 participants. It isn't representative at the population level and shouldn't be read as national or sector-wide statistics. It's published anyway because the methodology is what's meant to be scrutinized, and because the only way to improve the sample is to open up the instrument.

What it measures

The EFI is a value from 0 to 100 that expresses the proportion of declared intentions that don't turn into action within their expected window, weighted by how relevant the person themselves rates each intention. A low value means what gets decided actually gets done; a high one means intention and execution are systematically decoupled.

0 – 25
Low

Execution follows the decision with no appreciable resistance.

26 – 50
Moderate

Frequent delays on specific tasks, with no stable pattern.

51 – 75
High

An identifiable pattern recurrently blocks the same type of task.

76 – 100
Critical

Intention stops being a useful predictor of behavior.

How it's calculated

Three variables, collected within the KAIRON session itself, with no added questionnaire. The full methodology is public so anyone can replicate or challenge it.

V1

Intention conversion rate

Proportion of actions agreed on at the close of an I-R-O session that get confirmed as done at the next contact.

V2

Start latency

Time elapsed between the decision to act and the first verifiable move, normalized by task type.

V3

Pattern recurrence

Number of times the same cognitive pattern gets identified on the same type of task within a 30-day period.

Data is aggregated anonymously, and no organization receives individual information about its people. The separation between personal data and aggregated data is structural, not a revisable policy.

Pattern distribution in the pilot sample

Which pattern was identified most often across recorded sessions. Percentages add up to more than 100 because the same person activates different patterns depending on the situation.

Perfectionism38%
Procrastination29%
Impostor syndrome21%
Self-sabotage12%

Provisional figures, pending confirmation with the full sample. Before publishing, replace with the real values exported from the KAIRON panel and date the data cutoff.

How to cite this index

G-Structure (2026). Execution Friction Index, preliminary edition. Guayaquil, Ecuador. Available at g-structure.co/en/friction-index

The instrument and methodology are free to use, including application by third parties for research purposes. To access the aggregated data in structured format, write to guillermo@g-structure.co.

Measure your team's friction

The Execution Diagnostic applies the same instrument to a real cohort and delivers the aggregated result in 30 days.

See KAIRON for Teams